Rules, codes and regulatory instruments, drafted to survive scrutiny.
Amendments and new instruments, checked provision by provision for authority under — and consistency with — the empowering legislation. Drafted by a practitioner who does this work at national regulatory level, and delivers it personally.
An instrument that exceeds its empowering Act is not law. It is litigation.
Rules, codes of conduct and regulations only bind because a statute says they may. Draft past that authority — or amend without checking what else the change touches — and the instrument invites review, the disciplinary outcome built on it collapses, and the organisation's credibility goes with it.
Most drafting failures are not bad ideas. They are good intentions drafted without the discipline of the empowering framework: definitions that drift from the Act, amendment schedules that orphan cross-references, transitional gaps that strand matters already in progress, consultation processes that cannot be evidenced afterwards.
Instruments, and everything around them.
Amendments to existing instruments
Amendment schedules to rules, codes of conduct and regulations — each change checked against the empowering Act, the rest of the instrument, and everything that cross-refers to it, with transitional provisions that work.
New rules, codes & regulations
Complete instruments drafted from the empowering provision up: definitions, substantive provisions, enforcement machinery, and commencement — in plain, enforceable language.
Policies & governance instruments
Organisational policies, board and committee charters, delegations of authority and terms of reference — internal instruments drafted with the same rigour as public ones.
Agreements & opinions
Memoranda of understanding and inter-institutional agreements, service level agreements and commercial contracts, and formal written legal opinions interpreting or supporting an instrument.
What "drafted to survive scrutiny" means in practice.
- Vires first. Every provision traced to the empowering legislation before a word of substance is settled — if the authority is not there, we say so, and help you find the lawful route.
- Consistency throughout. Definitions, cross-references and numbering reconciled across the instrument and against the surrounding statutory framework.
- Transitional provisions that work. Matters in progress, existing registrations and pending proceedings carried across deliberately, not by accident.
- A defensible process. Consultation, comment handling, approval, versioning and publication designed so the adoption record stands up later.
- Plain-language drafting notes. The board, council or committee adopting the instrument gets a clause-by-clause explanation it can actually use.
How institutions engage us.
- Fixed fee per instrument or project, confirmed in writing after a short scoping discussion, before any work begins. The figure in the engagement letter is the figure invoiced.
- Confidential by default. A mutual non-disclosure agreement is available before anything substantive is shared; client identities are never used in marketing without written permission.
- Document-based and remote-friendly. The work is drafting; it travels by secure document exchange, with meetings where they genuinely help.
- Procurement-ready. Formal quotations for supply chain processes are provided on request, with the firm's B-BBEE (EME) sworn affidavit and tax compliance documentation. The firm is a Level 1, 100% black-owned exempted micro enterprise.
- Planned dates, met. The practice is deliberately capacity-managed and commits only to delivery dates it can meet.
Asked before most engagements.
Do you act for regulators and professional bodies?
Can you amend an existing instrument, or only draft new ones?
How is this work priced?
Can you provide formal quotations for procurement processes?
Send us the instrument, or the problem.
A short, confidential scoping discussion — no charge — and a written fixed fee before anything begins.
Get in touch